---

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014

or

o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______ to ______

Commission File Number: 000-30939

 

---

ACTIVE POWER, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware		74-2961657
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
2128 W. Braker Lane, BK 12, Austin, Texas		78758
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(512) 836-6464

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   x  Yes  ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    x  Yes  o  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer     ¨		Accelerated Filer   x
Non-Accelerated Filer       o	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller Reporting Company   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    ¨ Yes   x No

The number of shares of common stock, par value of $0.001 per share, outstanding at October 29, 2014 was 23,091,237.

---

---

ACTIVE POWER, INC.

INDEX

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION	3
Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	3
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	14
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.	20
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.	21
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION	21
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.	21
Item 1A. Risk Factors.	21
Item 6. Exhibits.	22

---

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1.

Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Active Power, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except par value)

		September 30, 2014				December 31, 2013
		(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	13,804			$	12,261
Restricted cash			42				520
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of  $217 and $313 at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively			11,186				9,075
Inventories, net			8,964				12,020
Prepaid expenses and other			715				680
Total current assets			34,711				34,556
Property and equipment, net			2,333				3,056
Deposits and other			297				295
Total assets		$	37,341			$	37,907
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable		$	2,476			$	2,993
Accrued expenses			4,119				5,583
Deferred revenue			3,590				2,749
Revolving line of credit			5,535				5,535
Total current liabilities			15,720				16,860
Long-term liabilities			852				741
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock - $0.001 par value; 2,000 shares authorized			-				-
Common stock - $0.001 par value; 40,000 and 30,000 shares authorized; 23,160 and 19,452 shares issued and 23,091 and 19,388 shares outstanding at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively			23				19
Treasury stock			(229	)			(215	)
Additional paid-in capital			302,325				290,964
Accumulated deficit			(281,951	)			(271,168	)
Other accumulated comprehensive income			601				706
Total stockholders' equity			20,769				20,306
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity		$	37,341			$	37,907

See accompanying notes.

---

Active Power, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

(in thousands, except per share amounts; unaudited)

 

		Three Months Ended September 30,								Nine Months Ended September 30,
		2014				2013				2014				2013
Revenues:
Product revenue		$	9,729			$	8,023			$	24,670			$	34,858
Service and other revenue			2,963				5,131				9,114				12,915
Total revenue			12,692				13,154				33,784				47,773
Cost of goods sold:
Cost of product revenue			7,490				6,784				19,747				25,373
Cost of service and other revenue			1,442				2,426				5,434				7,180
Total cost of goods sold			8,932				9,210				25,181				32,553
Gross profit			3,760				3,944				8,603				15,220
Operating expenses:
Research and development			1,516				2,149				5,196				5,580
Selling and marketing			2,891				2,714				8,931				8,684
General and administrative			1,455				2,046				4,530				4,759
Total operating expenses			5,862				6,909				18,657				19,023
Loss from Operations			(2,102	)			(2,965	)			(10,054	)			(3,803	)
Interest expense, net			(94	)			(118	)			(301	)			(282	)
Other income (expense), net			(42	)			(52	)			(170	)			(139	)
Loss before income taxes			(2,238	)			(3,135	)			(10,525	)			(4,224	)
Income tax expense			(258	)			-				(258	)			-
Net loss		$	(2,496	)		$	(3,135	)		$	(10,783	)		$	(4,224	)
Net loss per share, basic and diluted		$	(0.11	)		$	(0.16	)		$	(0.48	)		$	(0.22	)
Shares used in computing net loss per share, basic and diluted			23,124				19,337				22,271				19,188
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss		$	(2,496	)		$	(3,135	)		$	(10,783	)		$	(4,224	)
Translation gain (loss) on subsidiaries denominated in foreign currencies			(95	)			238				(75	)			39
Comprehensive loss		$	(2,591	)		$	(2,897	)		$	(10,858	)		$	(4,185	)

See accompanying notes.

---

Active Power, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity

(in thousands; unaudited)

		Common Stock								Treasury Stock
		Number of Shares				Par Value				Number of Shares				At Cost				Additional Paid-In Capital				Accumulated Deficit				Other Accumulated Comprehen- sive Income (Loss)				Total Stockholders' Equity
Balance at December 31, 2013			19,452			$	19				51			$	(215	)		$	290,964			$	(271,168	)		$	706			$	20,306
Employee stock option exercises			43				-				-				-				129				-				-				129
Release of Restricted Stock			14				-				-				-				-				-				-				-
Shares held in treasury			-				-				5				(14	)			-				-				-				(14	)
Net translation gain on foreign subsidiaries			-				-				-				-				-				-				(105	)			(105	)
Stock-based compensation			-				-				-				-				798				-				-				798
Sale of common stock, net of issuance costs			3,651				4				-				-				10,434				-				-				10,438
Net loss			-				-				-				-				-				(10,783	)			-				(10,783	)
Balance at September 30, 2014			23,160			$	23				56			$	(229	)		$	302,325			$	(281,951	)		$	601			$	20,769

See accompanying notes.

---

Active Power, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

(in thousands; unaudited)

		Nine Months Ended September 30,
		2014				2013
Operating activities
Net loss		$	(10,783	)		$	(4,224	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash (used in) provided by operating activites:
Depreciation expense			922				804
Change to allowance for doubtful accounts			(96	)			350
Loss (gain) on disposal of fixed assets			(15	)			33
Impairment on fixed assets			57				69
Stock-based compensation			798				916
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash			478				(511	)
Accounts receivable			(2,014	)			8,799
Inventories			3,056				(2,613	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets			(37	)			(1,808	)
Accounts payable			(517	)			425
Accrued expenses			(1,464	)			174
Deferred revenue			841				(1,504	)
Long term liabilities			111				24
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities			(8,663	)			934
Investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment			(291	)			(927	)
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets			19				68
Net cash used in investing activities			(272	)			(859	)
Financing activities
Proceeds from public offering of common stock, net of issuance costs			10,438				-
Proceeds from employee stock purchases			129				683
Issuance costs, shelf registration			-				(20	)
Taxes paid related to net share settlement of equity awards			(14	)			(49	)
Net cash provided by financing activities			10,553				614
Translation gain (loss) on subsidiaries in foreign currencies			(75	)			39
Change in cash and cash equivalents			1,543				728
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period			12,261				13,524
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period		$	13,804			$	14,252

See accompanying notes.

---

Active Power, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2014

(unaudited)

1.	Basis of Presentation

Active Power, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, “we”, “us”, “Active Power” or “Company”) design, manufacture, sell, and service flywheel-based uninterruptible power supply (“UPS”) products that use kinetic energy to provide short-term power as a cleaner alternative to conventional electro-chemical battery-based energy storage.  We also design, manufacture, sell, and service modular infrastructure solutions (“MIS”) that integrate critical power components into a pre-packaged, purpose built enclosure that may include our UPS products as a component. Our products and solutions are based on our patented flywheel and power electronics technology and are designed to ensure continuity for data centers and other mission critical operations in the event of power disturbances.

Our products and solutions are designed to deliver continuous conditioned power during power disturbances such as voltage sags and surges, and to provide ride-through power in the event of a brief utility failure, supporting operations until utility power is restored or a longer term alternative power source, such as a diesel generator, is started. We sell our products globally through our direct sales force, manufacturer’s representatives, distributors, Original Equipment Manufacturer (“OEM”) channel, and IT partners in the Americas, in Europe, Middle East, and Africa (“EMEA”), and in the Asia Pacific region (“APAC”).

We also offer services, including hardware and software maintenance, on all Active Power products, and other professional services such as assessment and implementation, for our customers’ infrastructure projects.

We were founded as a Texas Corporation in 1992 and reincorporated in Delaware in 2000. Our headquarters are in Austin, Texas, with international offices in the United Kingdom, Germany, and China.

The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2013, which has been derived from our audited financial statements, and the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) for interim financial statements and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim reporting, and include the accounts of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated upon consolidation. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring items) necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position of the Company and its consolidated results of operations and cash flows. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and accompanying notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

2.	Significant Accounting Policies and Supplemental Balance Sheet Information

For a complete description of our principal accounting policies see Note 1. “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.  Shown below are certain of our principal accounting policies.

Restricted Cash

Our restricted cash balance of $42,000 as of September 30, 2014 consists of a $7,000 deposit guarantee for our building lease in the United Kingdom, which expired in October 2014 and a $35,000 performance guarantee outstanding for a term of 24 months to a customer that was secured with a letter of credit. As of December 31, 2013, our restricted cash balance was $0.5 million which consisted primarily of secured performance and deposit guarantees. As of the period ended September 30, 2014, all of these guarantees were satisfied.

---

Receivables

Accounts receivable consist of the following (in thousands):

		September 30, 2014				December 31, 2013
Trade receivables		$	11,403			$	9,388
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts			(217	)			(313	)
		$	11,186			$	9,075

We estimate an allowance for doubtful accounts based on factors related to the credit risk of each customer. Historically, our credit losses have been minimal, primarily because the majority of our revenues were generated from large customers, such as Caterpillar, Inc. (“Caterpillar”) and Hewlett Packard Corporation (“HP”).

Inventories

Inventories consist of the following (in thousands, net of allowance):

		September 30, 2014				December 31, 2013
Raw materials		$	4,472			$	4,521
Work in process			2,028				2,429
Finished goods			2,464				5,070
		$	8,964			$	12,020

Accrued Expenses

Accrued expenses consist of the following (in thousands):

		September 30, 2014				December 31, 2013
Compensation, severance and benefits		$	1,563			$	2,685
Warranty liability			346				529
Property, Sales, Federal and VAT Taxes			1,077				483
Professional fees			412				759
Other			721				1,127
		$	4,119			$	5,583

In September 2014, we settled a tax examination of our German subsidiary for years 2007 through 2011.  We recorded a provision for income taxes of $0.3 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2014 related to settlement of the German tax examination.

Warranty Liability

Generally, the warranty period for our power quality products is 12 months from the date of commissioning or 18 months from the date of shipment from Active Power, whichever period is shorter. Occasionally, we offer longer warranty periods to certain customers. The warranty period for products sold to our primary OEM customer, Caterpillar, is 12 months from the date of shipment to the end-user, or up to 36 months from shipment from Active Power. This is dependent upon Caterpillar complying with our storage requirements for our products in order to preserve this warranty period beyond the standard 18-month limit. We provide for the estimated cost of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized and this accrual is included in accrued expenses and long-term liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

---

Changes in our warranty liability are presented in the following table (in thousands):

Balance at December 31, 2013		$	562
Warranty expense			399
Payments			(532	)
Adjustments			(50	)
Balance at September 30, 2014		$	379
Warranty liability included in Accrued expenses		$	346
Warranty liability included in Long-term liabilities			33
Balance at September 30, 2014		$	379

In general, we recognize revenue when four criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists; (ii) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. Our revenue-generating transactions generally fall into one of the following categories of revenue recognition:

●

We recognize product revenue at the time of shipment for a significant portion of all products sold directly to customers and through distributors because title and risk of loss pass on delivery to the common carrier. Our customers and distributors do not have the right to return products. If title and risk of loss pass at some other point in time, we recognize such revenue for our customers when the product is delivered to the customer and title and risk of loss have passed.  We may enter into bill-and-hold arrangements and when this happens delivery may not occur, but other criteria are reviewed to determine proper timing of revenue recognition.

●

We recognize installation, service and maintenance revenue at the time the service is performed.

●

We recognize revenue associated with extended maintenance agreements (“EMAs”) over the life of the contracts using the straight-line method, which approximates the expected timing in which applicable services are performed. Amounts collected in advance of revenue recognition are recorded as a current liability in the deferred revenue line of the consolidated balance sheet or as a long-term liability based on the time from the balance sheet date to the future date of revenue recognition.

●

We recognize revenue on certain rental programs over the life of the rental agreement using the straight-line method. Amounts collected in advance of revenue recognition are recorded as a current or long-term liability based on the time from the balance sheet date to the future date of revenue recognition.

●

Shipping costs reimbursed by the customer are included in revenue.

When collectability is not reasonably assured, we defer revenue and will recognize revenue on a cost recovery basis as payments are received.

Multiple element arrangements (“MEAs”) are arrangements to sell products to customers that frequently include multiple deliverables. Our most significant MEAs include the sale of one or more of our CleanSource® UPS or CleanSource PowerHouse products, combined with one or more of the following products: design services, project management, commissioning and installation services, spare parts or consumables, and EMAs. Delivery of the various products or performance of services within the arrangement may or may not coincide. Certain services related to design and consulting may occur prior to product delivery. Commissioning and installation typically take place within six months of product delivery, depending upon customer requirements. EMAs, consumables, and repair, maintenance or consulting services generally are delivered over a period of one to five years. In certain arrangements revenue recognized is limited to the amount invoiced or received that is not contingent on the delivery of future products and services.

---

When arrangements include multiple elements, we allocate revenue to each element based on the relative selling price and recognize revenue when the elements have standalone value and the four criteria for revenue recognition have been met. We establish the selling price of each element based on Vendor Specific Objective Evidence (“VSOE”) if available, Third Party Evidence (“TPE”) if VSOE is not available, or Best Estimate of Selling Price (“BESP”) if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. We generally determine selling price based on amounts charged separately for the delivered and undelivered elements to similar customers in standalone sales of the specific elements. When arrangements include an EMA, we recognize revenue related to the EMA at the stated contractual price on a straight-line basis over the life of the agreement.

Any taxes imposed by governmental authorities on our revenue-producing transactions with customers are shown in our consolidated statements of operations on a net-basis; that is, excluded from our reported revenues.

Recently issued accounting pronouncements not yet adopted

In August 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-15, (“ASU 2014-15”), “Disclosure of Uncertainties About an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern”. ASU 2014-15 requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements are issued and provides guidance on determining when and how to disclose going concern uncertainties in the financial statements. Certain disclosures will be required if conditions give rise to substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. ASU 2014-15 applies to all entities and is effective for annual and interim reporting periods ending after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this standard will have a material effect on its financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”, “Topic 606”. This ASU will supersede the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance, and creates a Topic 606 Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The Company will adopt this guidance January 1, 2017. We are evaluating the new guidelines to see if they will have a significant impact on our consolidated results of operation, financial condition or cash flows.

3.	Net Loss Per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share (in thousands, except per share data):

		Three Months Ended September 30,								Nine Months Ended September 30,
		2014				2013				2014				2013
Net loss		$	(2,496	)		$	(3,135	)		$	(10,783	)		$	(4,224	)
Basic and dilutive:
Weighted-average shares of common stock oustanding			23,124				19,337				22,271				19,188
Basic and diluted net loss per share		$	(0.11	)		$	(0.16	)		$	(0.48	)		$	(0.22	)

The calculation of diluted loss per share excludes 2,361,866 and 1,943,064 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of employee stock options for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and non-vested shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of 25,943 and 96,299 restricted stock units for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

---

4.	Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair value is measured based on an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to satisfy a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, fair value is established, which categorizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2—Significant observable inputs other than quoted prices in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3—One or more significant inputs that are unobservable and supported by little or no market data.

Inputs are referred to as assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The uses of inputs in the valuation process are categorized into a three-level fair value hierarchy.

Our financial instruments consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and our revolving line of credit. We believe all of these financial instruments are recorded at amounts that approximate their current market values.

Our Level 1 assets consist of cash equivalents, which are primarily invested in money-market funds. These assets are classified as Level 1 because they are valued using quoted prices in active markets and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical assets and liabilities.

Our cash and cash equivalents include money-market funds for which the fair value was determined using Level 1 inputs and was $3.1 million as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. For cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable, the carrying amount approximates fair value because of the relative short maturity of those instruments.

5.	Guarantees

In certain geographical regions, particularly Europe, we are sometimes required to issue performance guarantees to our customers as a condition of sale. These guarantees usually provide financial protection to our customers in the event that we fail to fulfill our delivery or warranty obligations. We secure these guarantees with standby letters of credit through our bank. At September 30, 2014, we had a $7,000 deposit guarantee outstanding for our building lease in the United Kingdom which expired on October 24, 2014 and a $35,000 performance guarantee outstanding for a term of 24 months to a customer that was secured with a letter of credit. At December 31, 2013, we had a $0.5 million performance guarantee outstanding to a customer that was secured with a letter of credit. This guarantee expired on April 17, 2014. Our restricted cash, as shown on the balance sheet, is related to these guarantees.

 

6.	Revolving Line of Credit

On July 28, 2014, we entered into a Third Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (“Loan Agreement”) with Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”). This amended three-year loan facility provides for a secured revolving line of credit in an aggregate amount of up to eighty percent (80%) of the facility amount of $18.75 million, or $15.0 million, and increased our inventory and purchase order availability from $3.5 million to $7.0 million, subject to certain borrowing bases. Purchase orders and eligible inventory are subject to a sublimit of $4.0 million, and UK accounts receivable have a $5.0 million sublimit.  If we maintain our Liquidity Ratio of 2.50:1.00 for the immediately preceding Reconciliation Period, the sublimit will be uncapped.

---

The loans made to us under the Loan Agreement are secured by a lien on substantially all of our assets, including the assets of Active Power Solutions Limited, our wholly-owned United Kingdom subsidiary, and the assets of Active Power (Germany) GmbH, our indirect wholly-owned German subsidiary.  The only direct or indirect subsidiaries of Active Power, Inc. that are not guarantors under the Loan Agreement are Active Power China (Beijing) Co. Ltd. and immaterial subsidiaries that are not operating companies.  There are no restrictions on the ability of any of the subsidiary guarantors to transfer funds to Active Power, Inc. in the form of loans, advances or dividends, except as provided by applicable law. On July 28, 2014, Active Power (Germany) GmbH, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Active Power (Switzerland) AG, entered into a Borrower Joinder Supplement with Active Power and Silicon Valley Bank, under which Active Power (Germany) GmbH guaranteed all of the obligations of Active Power under the Loan Agreement and secured its obligations under the Loan Agreement with a security interest on substantially all of its assets.

The other key terms of the Loan Agreement remain unchanged, including customary affirmative covenants, a minimum liquidity ratio, the borrowing base eligibility (formerly called “streamline ratio”), reporting requirements, and other terms and conditions. We are currently in compliance with all loan covenants under the loan facility. As of September 30, 2014, we had outstanding borrowings of $5.5 million under this loan facility and, based on the borrowing base formula, the additional amount available to us for use ranged between $2.1 million and $5.6 million during the quarter. For further information regarding this loan facility, refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, and to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 29, 2014.

7.	Stockholders’ Equity

On May 28, 2014, our stockholders approved an amendment to the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 30 million shares to 40 million shares.

In March 2014, we sold approximately 3.7 million shares of common stock at a purchase price of $3.15 per share in a public underwritten offering made under a shelf registration statement that we had filed with the SEC and that had been declared effective in June 2013. This offering resulted in proceeds, net of expenses including underwriting discounts, commissions and fees of $0.8 million and professional service expenses of $0.2 million, of approximately $10.4 million. The proceeds from this offering will be used by us to help fund our working capital requirements and for general corporate purposes.

8.	Commitments and Contingencies

The Company may be involved, either as plaintiff or defendant, in a variety of ongoing claims, demands, suits, investigations, tax matters and proceedings that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of its business.  In evaluating whether a contingency should be disclosed, the Company considers if there is at least a reasonable possibility that a loss or an additional loss may have been incurred, and either an accrual is not made because any of the conditions, or an exposure to loss exists in excess of the amount accrued.  The Company evaluated all potentially significant litigation, government investigations, claims or assessments in which the Company is involved and determined there were no contingent losses, either accrued or reasonably possible of loss that could materially effect its results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.

The Company records an accrual with respect to a claim, suit, investigation or proceeding when it is reasonably probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Any recorded liabilities, including any changes to such liabilities for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, were not material to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The following is a summary of the more significant legal matters involving the Company.

---

SEC Inquiry

By letter dated September 30, 2013, the SEC Division of Enforcement notified us that it is conducting an investigation regarding us, including matters relating to our public statements regarding Digital China Information Services Company Limited (“Digital China”) and our distribution relationships in China. We have been and intend to continue cooperating fully with the SEC.

Audit Committee Internal Investigation

The audit committee of our Board of Directors, with the assistance of independent counsel, conducted an investigation into the facts and circumstances surrounding our agreements and transactions with Qiyuan Network Systems Limited (“Qiyuan”), including the statements made regarding Qiyuan’s affiliation with Digital China. This investigation was completed in February 2014. The audit committee of our Board of Directors and the Company reviewed the results of the investigation and concluded that the investigation had not uncovered any relevant material information not disclosed in our various filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Stockholder Litigation

Class action complaint

On September 10, 2013, a purported class action complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas against us and certain of our former executives. The case is captioned Don Lee v. Active Power, Inc., et. al. (Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-00797-SS). As amended, the complaint alleges that on February 19, 2013, we reported that we had begun working with an unnamed Chinese distributor partner, and that on April 30, 2013, we announced in press releases and conference calls that we had entered into a strategic distribution partnership with Digital China. However, on September 5, 2013, after the close of trading, we disclosed that our partnership was with Qiyuan Network System Limited, which is neither an affiliate nor a subsidiary of Digital China. The amended complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and seeks unspecified damages on behalf of all stockholders who purchased common stock between February 19 and September 5, 2013.  On March 7, 2014, we filed a motion to dismiss the class action complaint.  Our motion was denied by the Court on July 2, 2014.  On August 11, 2014, we filed an answer to the class action complaint, and on September 2, 2014, the Court declined to certify its order of July 2, 2014 for an interlocutory appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. 

Derivative actions

On September 13, 2013 and October 14, 2013, two separate stockholders filed complaints in the District Court of Travis County, Texas, purporting to bring derivative actions on behalf of us against certain current and former officers and directors of the Company. The first derivative action is captioned Okumura v. Almgren, et. al. (Cause No. D-1-GN-13-003230), and the second derivative action is captioned Shaev v. Milner, et. al. (Cause No. D-1-GN-13-003557). The allegations of each derivative complaint mirror those of the class action complaint, and they assert claims for breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, and/or abuse of control and seek damages on our behalf.  These derivative actions were stayed by agreement pending resolution of the motion to dismiss in the securities class action. The stay was lifted and on August 4, 2014, the parties filed a joint motion to consolidate the two derivative cases.  On September 18, 2014, the District Court appointed lead counsel in the consolidated derivative action.

Proposed settlements

On September 23, 2014, we reached agreements in principle and entered into memorandums of understanding to settle both the class action complaint and the consolidated derivative actions.  The proposed settlements would resolve for all defendants all of the issues that are pending in the class action complaint and in the consolidated derivative actions.  If completed, the class action settlement would result in a payment of $1.5 million to the settlement class, inclusive of fees and expenses.  The proposed consolidated derivative settlement includes, among other things, certain governance improvements by us.  We anticipate that the total settlement amounts and related expenses would be paid from insurance proceeds.  The proposed settlements are not yet consummated, and are subject to a number of conditions. The terms outlined in the memorandums of understanding are subject to the parties concluding definitive settlement agreements. The proposed settlements are also subject to final approval by our insurance carrier and by the Courts following completion of a fairness hearing. Hearing dates have not yet been set on final approval of the proposed settlements.

---

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, the financial statements and notes thereto included in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q and the financial statements and notes thereto and our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2013, included in our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K. This report contains forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that involve risks and uncertainties. Our expectations with respect to future results of operations that may be embodied in oral and written forward-looking statements, including any forward-looking statements that may be included in this report, are subject to risks and uncertainties that must be considered when evaluating the likelihood of our realization of such expectations. Our actual results could differ materially. The words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “project,” “will,” and similar phrases as they relate to us are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. In addition, please see the “Risk Factors” in Part 1, Item 1A, of our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K and in Part II, Item 1A, of this Form 10-Q for a discussion of items that may affect our future results.

Overview

Active Power designs, manufactures, sells, and services flywheel-based UPS products that use kinetic energy to provide short-term power as a cleaner alternative to conventional electro-chemical battery-based energy storage.  We also design, manufacture, sell, and service MIS products that integrate critical power components into a pre-packaged, purpose built enclosure that may include our UPS products as a component. Our products and solutions are based on our patented flywheel and power electronics technology and are designed to ensure continuity for data centers and other mission critical operations in the event of power disturbances.

Our products and solutions are designed to deliver continuous, conditioned power during power disturbances such as voltage sags and surges, and to provide ride-through power in the event of a brief utility failure, supporting operations until utility power is restored or a longer term alternative power source, such as a diesel generator, is started.

We offer services, including hardware and software maintenance, on all Active Power products, and other professional services such as assessment and implementation for our customers’ infrastructure projects.

We were founded as Texas Corporation in 1992 and reincorporated in Delaware in 2000. Our headquarters are in Austin, Texas, and we have international offices in the United Kingdom, Germany, and China.

---

 

		Three Months Ended September 30,																Variance 2014 vs. 2013
($ in thousands)		2014				% of total revenue				2013				% of total revenue				$				%
Product revenue		$	9,729				77	%		$	8,023				61	%		$	1,706				21	%
Service and other revenue			2,963				23	%			5,131				39	%			(2,168	)			-42	%
Total revenue			12,692				100	%			13,154				100	%			(462	)			-4	%
Cost of product revenue			7,490				59	%			6,784				52	%			706				10	%
Cost of service and other revenue			1,442				11	%			2,426				18	%			(984	)			-41	%
Total cost of goods sold			8,932				70	%			9,210				70	%			(278	)			-3	%
Gross profit			3,760				30	%			3,944				30	%			(184	)			-5	%
Operating expenses:
Research and development			1,516				12	%			2,149				16	%			(633	)			-29	%
Selling and marketing			2,891				23	%			2,714				21	%			177				7	%
General and administrative			1,455				11	%			2,046				16	%			(591	)			-29	%
Total operating expenses			5,862				46	%			6,909				53	%			(1,047	)			-15	%
Loss from Operations			(2,102	)			-17	%			(2,965	)			-23	%			863				29	%
Interest expense, net			(94	)			-1	%			(118	)			-1	%			24				20	%
Other income (expense), net			(42	)			0	%			(52	)			0	%			10				19	%
Loss before income taxes			(2,238	)			-18	%			(3,135	)			-24	%			897				29	%
Income tax expense			(258	)			-2	%			-				0	%			(258	)			-100	%
Net loss		$	(2,496	)			-20	%		$	(3,135	)			-24	%		$	639				20	%

		Nine Months Ended September 30,																Variance 2014 vs. 2013
($ in thousands)		2014				% of total revenue				2013				% of total revenue				$				%
										(restated)
Product revenue		$	24,670				73	%		$	34,858				73	%		$	(10,188	)			-29	%
Service and other revenue			9,114				27	%			12,915				27	%			(3,801	)			-29	%
Total revenue			33,784				100	%			47,773				100	%			(13,989	)			-29	%
Cost of product revenue			19,747				58	%			25,373				53	%			(5,626	)			-22	%
Cost of service and other revenue			5,434				16	%			7,180				15	%			(1,746	)			-24	%
Total cost of goods sold			25,181				75	%			32,553				68	%			(7,372	)			-23	%
Gross profit			8,603				25	%			15,220				32	%			(6,617	)			-43	%
Operating expenses:
Research and development			5,196				15	%			5,580				12	%			(384	)			-7	%
Selling and marketing			8,931				26	%			8,684				18	%			247				3	%
General and administrative			4,530				13	%			4,759				10	%			(229	)			-5	%
Total operating expenses			18,657				55	%			19,023				40	%			(366	)			-2	%
Loss from Operations			(10,054	)			-30	%			(3,803	)			-8	%			(6,251	)			-164	%
Interest expense, net			(301	)			-1	%			(282	)			-1	%			(19	)			-7	%
Other income (expense), net			(170	)			-1	%			(139	)			0	%			(31	)			-22	%
Loss before income taxes			(10,525	)			-31	%			(4,224	)			-9	%			(6,301	)			149	%
Income tax expense			(258	)			-1	%			-				0	%			(258	)			-100	%
Net loss		$	(10,783	)			-32	%		$	(4,224	)			-9	%		$	(6,559	)			155	%

---

 Product revenue.  Our product revenue was derived from the following sources:

($ in thousands)		Three Months Ended September 30,								Variance
		2014				2013				$				%
Product revenue:
UPS product revenue		$	8,383			$	6,495			$	1,888				29	%
Modular Infrastructure Solutions			1,346				1,528				(182	)			-12	%
Total product revenue		$	9,729			$	8,023			$	1,706				21	%
($ in thousands)		Nine Months Ended September 30,								Variance
		2014				2013				$				%
Product revenue:
UPS product revenue		$	21,178			$	16,731			$	4,447				27	%
Modular Infrastructure Solutions			3,492				18,127				(14,635	)			-81	%
Total product revenue		$	24,670			$	34,858			$	(10,188	)			-29	%

Product revenue for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014 decreased by $10.2 million, or 29%, to $24.7 million compared to $34.9 million in the same period in 2013. This decrease was primarily due to the 81% reduction in MIS revenues in 2014 compared to the same period in 2013 due to a large order in the 2013 period that was not repeated in 2014. UPS product revenue for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014 increased by approximately $4.4 million, or 27%, to $21.2 million compared to $16.7 million in the same period in 2013. 

Product revenue from our OEM channel for the three-month period ended September 30, 2014 was $2.9 million, an increase of approximately $0.5 million, or 17%, compared to revenue of $2.4 million for the third quarter of 2013. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014, product revenue from our OEM channel was $6.0 million, an increase of $0.5 million, or 10%, compared to $5.5 million for the same period in 2013. The size and volume of orders from our OEM channel can fluctuate significantly on a quarterly basis, and we continue to see a small number of large transactions from our OEM channel. Sales to Caterpillar, our primary OEM channel, represented $2.9 million and $6.0 million, or 30% and 24% of our product revenue, for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2014, compared to $2.4 million and $5.3 million, or 30% and 15% of our product revenue, in the comparable periods of 2013.

Product revenue from our IT channel for the third quarter of 2014 was $1.3 million, compared to $1.5 million for the third quarter of 2013. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014, product revenue from our IT channel was $2.1 million, a decrease of $8.3 million, or 80%, compared to $10.4 million for the same period of 2013. These reductions reflect decreased demand for our MIS products during the first half of 2014 from our IT channel partners, primarily HP. The level of orders from this channel fluctuates depending on our partners’ success and the end user’s need for infrastructure solutions.

Product revenue in the Americas was $6.8 million, or 70% of our product revenue, for the three-month period ended September 30, 2014, compared to $4.1 million, or 51% of our product revenue, for the same period in 2013. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014, our sales in the Americas were $15.9 million, or 65% of our total product revenue, compared to $28.8 million, or 83% for the same period in 2013. The decrease reflects lower MIS revenues which historically have largely originated in the North American market.

---

We sell products directly to customers in APAC and EMEA and also through a network of international distributors. Product sales to customers in APAC were $0.6 million, or 6% of our total product revenue, in the three-month period ended September 30, 2014, compared to $2.8 million, or 35%, for the same period in 2013. Our sales in APAC were $1.8 million in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014, compared to $2.9 million for the same period in 2013. The decreases were primarily driven by lower UPS sales and turnover of our senior APAC sales team.

Product revenue in EMEA was $2.3 million, or 24% of product revenue, in the three-month period ended September 30, 2014, compared to $1.1 million, or 14%, for the same period of 2013. Our sales in EMEA were $6.9 million in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014, compared to $3.2 million for the same period in 2013. The increase in Product revenue in EMEA is primarily attributable to a large UPS sale in the nine month period ending September 30, 2014.

Service and other revenue. Service and other revenue decreased by approximately $2.2 million, or 42%, to $3.0 million for the three-month period ended September 30, 2014, compared to the same period of 2013. This decrease primarily reflects lower professional fees and other service revenue associated with MIS product sales recorded in the three-month period ended September 30, 2014. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014, our service and other revenue decreased by approximately $3.8 million, or 29%, compared to the same period of 2013. The decrease primarily reflects lower service revenue and professional fees associated with MIS product sales in 2013.

Cost of product revenue. Cost of product revenue as a percentage of total product revenue was 77% and 80% for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2014, compared to 85% and 73% for the same periods in 2013. The decrease in costs as a percentage of revenue for the three-month period ended September 30, 2014 reflects a favorable mix with higher margin UPS sales and lower ancillary equipment sold combined with improved absorption. The increase for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014 reflects a lower rate of absorption of overhead costs due to lower revenue and production.

Cost of service and other revenue. Cost of service and other revenue was 49% of service and other revenue in the three-month period ended September 30, 2014, compared to 47% for the same period of 2013.  The cost of service and other revenue was 60% of service and other revenue in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014, compared to 56% for the same period of 2013. These increases reflect a shift in the types of services provided, with professional services being down in 2014 compared to the same periods in 2013 due to large projects which were not repeated in 2014. The utilization of our service personnel will be affected by the number of MIS solution products implemented in a particular period and in periods where we have a low number of installation projects we would expect our costs as a percentage of revenue to increase due to lower employee utilization.

Gross profit. For each of the three-month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, our gross profit was 30% of revenue. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014, our gross profit was 25% of revenue, compared to 32% for the same period of 2013. This margin decrease is related to under absorption of fixed overhead costs in manufacturing and service due to the lower revenue and manufacturing production in the nine month period of 2014.

Research and development. Research and development expenses were approximately $0.6 million, or 29%, lower in the third quarter of 2014 compared to the third quarter of 2013. The decrease was primarily due to reduced costs for development activities on our next generation of UPS product incurred in the third quarter of 2013 that did not repeat in the third quarter of 2014.

For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014, our research and development expense was $5.2 million, compared to $5.6 million for the same period of 2013.  The decrease was due to reduced costs for development activities on our next generation of UPS product.

Selling and marketing. Selling and marketing costs were approximately $2.9 million in the third quarter of 2014, compared to $2.7 million for the same period of 2013.

---

Selling and marketing expenses were approximately $8.9 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014, compared to $8.7 million for the same period in 2013.

General and administrative. General and administrative expenses for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2014 were approximately $1.5 million and $4.5 million, respectively, compared to $2.0 million and $4.8 million for the same periods in 2013. These decreases were primarily due to a reduction in relocation and bad debt expense from 2013.

Interest expense, net. Net interest expense decreased approximately $24,000 and increased approximately $19,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2013. The interest expense incurred during 2014 and 2013 was in connection with the outstanding balance on our revolving credit facility.

Other income (expense), net. Other income (expense), net was $42,000 and $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and primarily reflects an impairment of a fixed asset along with foreign exchange losses or gains on bank accounts and sales contracts held in foreign currencies.

Other income (expense), net for the nine month period ended September 30, 2014 increased approximately $31,000, or 22%, compared to the same period in 2013, and primarily reflects an impairment of a fixed asset along with foreign exchange losses or gains on bank accounts and sales contracts held in foreign currencies.

Income tax expense. The following table summarizes the total income tax expense that the Company recorded, and the related effective tax rate, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands):

		Three Months Ended September 30,								Nine Months Ended September 30,
		2014				2013				2014				2013
Income tax expense		$	258			$	0			$	258			$	0
Effective tax rate			(11.5	)%			0	%			(2.5	)%			0	%

The increase in the effective tax rate for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 was primarily due to settlement under tax examination by the German tax authorities. In September 2014, we settled a tax examination of our German subsidiary for years 2007 through 2011.  In the settlement, we agreed to transfer pricing adjustments for the period under examination resulting in a reduction of loss carryovers and a deemed distribution subject to withholding taxes under German law.  We recorded a provision for income taxes of $0.3 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2014 related to settlement of the German tax examination.

  Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary sources of liquidity at September 30, 2014 are our cash and cash equivalents, our bank credit facilities and projected cash flows from operating activities. If we meet our cash flow projections, we expect we will have adequate capital resources to continue operating our business for at least the next twelve months. Our projections and our assumptions around the adequacy of our liquidity are based on estimates regarding expected revenues and future costs. However, there are scenarios in which our revenues may not meet our projections, our costs may exceed our estimates or our working capital needs may be greater than anticipated. Further, our estimates may change and future events or developments may also affect our estimates. Any of these factors may change our expectation of cash usage in the remainder of 2014 and beyond or significantly affect our level of liquidity.

---

On July 28, 2014, we entered into a Third Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (“Loan Agreement”) with Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”). This new amended three-year loan facility provides for a secured revolving line of credit in an aggregate amount of up to eighty percent (80%) of the facility amount of $18.750 million, or $15.0 million, and increased our inventory and purchase order availability from $3.5 million to $7.0 million subject to certain borrowing bases. Purchase orders and eligible inventory are subject to a sublimit of $4.0 million and accounts receivable for UK is $5.0 million.  In the event we maintain our Liquidity Ratio of 2.50:1.00 for the immediately preceding Reconciliation Periods the sublimit will be uncapped during this time.

The loans made to us under the Loan Agreement are secured by a lien on substantially all of our assets, including the assets of Active Power Solutions Limited, our wholly-owned United Kingdom subsidiary, and the assets of Active Power (Germany) GmbH, our indirect wholly-owned German subsidiary.  The only direct or indirect subsidiaries of Active Power, Inc. that are not guarantors under the Loan Agreement are Active Power China (Beijing) Co. Ltd. and immaterial subsidiaries that are not operating companies.  There are no restrictions on the ability of any of the subsidiary guarantors to transfer funds to Active Power, Inc. in the form of loans, advances or dividends, except as provided by applicable law. On July 28, 2014, Active Power (Germany) GmbH, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Active Power (Switzerland) AG, entered into a Borrower Joinder Supplement with Active Power and Silicon Valley Bank, under which Active Power (Germany) GmbH guaranteed all of the obligations of Active Power under the Loan Agreement and secured its obligations under the Loan Agreement with a security interest on substantially all of its assets.

The other key terms of the Loan Agreement remain unchanged, including customary affirmative covenants, a minimum liquidity ratio, the borrowing base eligibility (formerly called “streamline ratio”), reporting requirements, and other terms and conditions. We are currently in compliance with all loan covenants under the loan facility. As of September 30, 2014, we had outstanding borrowings of $5.5 million under this loan facility and, based on the borrowing base formula, the additional amount available to us for use ranged between $2.1 million and $5.6 million during the quarter. For further information regarding this loan facility, refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, and to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 29, 2014.

In March 2014, we sold approximately 3.7 million shares of common stock at a purchase price of $3.15 per share, for proceeds, net of fees and expenses, of approximately $10.4 million, in a public underwritten offering made under a shelf registration statement that we had filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and that had been declared effective in June 2013. The proceeds from this offering will be used by us to help fund our working capital requirements and for general corporate purposes.

Should additional funding be required or desirable, we would expect to raise the required funds through borrowings or public or private sales of debt or equity securities. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of convertible debt or equity securities, the ownership of our existing stockholders could be significantly diluted. If we obtain additional debt financing, a substantial portion of our operating cash flow may be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on such indebtedness, and the terms of the debt securities issued could impose significant restrictions on our operations. We do not know whether we will be able to secure additional funding, or funding on terms acceptable to us, to continue our operations as planned. If financing is not available, we may be required to reduce, delay or eliminate certain activities or to license or sell to others some of our proprietary technology.

The following table summarizes the changes in cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

($ in thousands)		Nine Months Ended September 30,								Variance
		2014				2013				$				%
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities		$	(8,663	)		$	934			$	(9,597	)			-1028	%

 

 

 

 

 

---

Cash used in operating activities was $8.7 million in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014 compared to cash provided by operating activities of $0.9 million the same period of 2013. Cash used in operating activities in 2014 was primarily due to higher net losses combined with a reduction in accrued expenses. The fluctuations in working capital can be impacted by the timing of product orders and shipments. In the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014, we saw a decrease in receivables of $2.0 million, a decrease of approximately $3.1 million in inventory, and a decrease of $0.5 million in restricted cash compared to December 31, 2013.  There was also a decrease in accrued expenses and accounts payable of $1.5 million and $0.5 million, respectively, from December 31, 2013 to September 30, 2014. These changes reflect the frequent changes in our working capital that can result in very large fluctuations in inventory, payables and receivables based on the large size of some of our orders.

Cash provided by operating activities in 2013 was primarily driven by cash resulting from a decrease from working capital reductions including a reduction in accounts receivables partially offset by a use of cash related to inventory manufactured in the period due to a reduction in UPS orders during the period and an increase in build for our new product through the third quarter of 2013.  Cash provided by operating activities was also partially offset by a use of cash in other current assets primarily related to the restatement of amounts owed to us by Qiyuan Network Systems.

The following table summarizes the changes in cash used in investing activities:

($ in thousands)		Nine Months Ended September 30,								Variance
		2014				2013				$				%
Cash used in investing activities		$	(272	)		$	(859	)		$	587				68	%

Investing activities primarily consist of purchases of property and equipment. Capital expenditures were $0.6 million, or 69% lower in the nine-month period ending September 30, 2014, compared to the same period of 2013, as we invested less in capital improvements during 2014.

Our capital expenditures for the next 12 months are expected to be in line with our 2013 spending.

The following table summarizes the changes in cash provided by financing activities:

($ in thousands)		Nine Months Ended September 30,								Variance
		2014				2013				$				%
Cash provided by financing activities		$	10,553			$	614			$	9,939				1619	%

 

Funds provided by financing activities in the nine-month ended September 30, 2014 primarily includes the sale of common stock at a purchase price of $3.15 per share, for proceeds, net of fees and expenses, of approximately $10.4 million, in a public underwritten offering, and also reflects the proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options.

We believe that our cash and cash equivalents, projected cash flows from operations and sources of available liquidity will be sufficient to fund our operations for the next twelve months. However, a sudden change in business volume, positive or negative, from any of our business or channel partners, or in our direct business, or any customer-driven events such as order or delivery deferral, could significantly impact our revenues and cash needs. We do have some opportunity to adjust expenditures or take other measures to reduce our cash consumption or to identify additional sources of funding if we anticipate an increase in our working capital requirements due to increased revenues or changes in our revenue mix. A significant increase in sales, especially in our MIS business, would likely increase our working capital requirements, due to the longer production time and cash cycle of sales of these products.

 

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

For a description of our market risks, see Part I, Item 7A in our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K. There have been no material changes in our exposures to market risk since December 31, 2013.

---

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), required by paragraph (b) of Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15, have concluded that, as of September 30, 2014, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that the information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act, (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting.

During the three months ended September 30, 2014, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) and Rule 15d-15(d) under the Exchange Act that have materially affected, or that we believe are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings.

Refer to note 8, “Commitments and Contingencies,” on pages 12 to 13 of this Form 10-Q.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors.

You should carefully consider the risks described below and in Item 1A of our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K before making a decision to invest in our common stock or in evaluating Active Power and our business. The risks and uncertainties described below and in our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties that we do not presently know, or that we currently view as immaterial, may also impair our business operations.

The information presented below updates, and should be read in conjunction with, the risk factors and information disclosed in our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Except as presented below, there have been no material changes from the risk factors described in our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our business could be impacted by changes in liquidity and by customer credit risk on receivables.

We have a history of operating losses and have not yet reached operating profitability on an annual basis. We incurred a net loss of $2.5 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2014. If our revenues do not meet our expectations, our costs exceed our estimates, or our working capital needs are greater than anticipated, we may not have adequate liquidity to continue operating our business. Our cash requirements will depend on many factors, including:

·

future sales growth;

·

the demand for our products;

·

the gross profit we are able to generate from our sales;

·

the timing, level, and extent of our research and development funding;

·

the rate of expansion of our sales and marketing activities;

·

the rate of expansion of our manufacturing processes;

·

our overall level of operating expenses;

·

the payment terms we negotiate with our suppliers; and

·

our default rates on receivables.

---

For example, a substantial increase in sales of our modular infrastructure solutions (“MIS”) or a substantial increase in UPS sales may materially impact the amount of working capital required to fund our operations. In order to increase our MIS sales, we may be required to make larger investments in inventory and receivables. These larger investments may require us to obtain additional sources of working capital, debt, or equity financing in order to fund our business. Even if we obtain additional debt financing, a substantial portion of our operating cash flow may be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on such indebtedness.

Most of our sales are on an open credit basis. As a result of our customer concentration, our failure to collect receivables from any of our customers in a timely manner could have a significant adverse effect on our liquidity. The collection risk may potentially increase as we sell more MIS, such as our  CleanSource PowerHouse products due to their higher average selling price. If future actual default rates on receivables differ from those currently anticipated, our working capital could decrease and we may not have adequate liquidity to continue operating our business.

Backlog may not result in revenue.

Our backlog is not necessarily a meaningful predictor of future results.  Backlog represents anticipated revenue from unfulfilled product orders and from service work not yet performed under signed contracts.  Due to possible changes in product delivery schedules and the potential for cancellation of unfulfilled product orders and service contracts by our customers, our backlog at any particular date should not be relied upon as being indicative of revenue for any succeeding period.  Some of the orders we accept from customers require certain conditions or contingencies to be satisfied prior to shipment or prior to commissioning or installation, some of which are outside of our control.  Time periods from receipt of an order to shipment date and installation vary widely, and may be determined by a number of factors, including the terms of the customer contract and the customer’s deployment plan.  Also, the size of an order or the scope of a service contract can be reduced significantly during the course of a project.  If the scope of an order or contract is revised, we adjust backlog accordingly.  For these and other reasons, we may not fully realize our entire backlog as revenue.

Tax Matters could adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.

We are subject to potential income tax and other taxes in the United States and in foreign jurisdictions.  Our tax liabilities are affected by the amount of income we have in various jurisdictions and the amounts we charge in intercompany transactions for products, services, funding and other items.  We are subject to periodic tax audits in the United States and in other various jurisdictions.  Tax authorities may disagree with our intercompany charges, cross-jurisdictional transfer pricing, or other matters and assess additional taxes.  We assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the need for and adequacy of a provision for income taxes.  However, the outcomes from these examinations could have an adverse effect on our provision for income taxes and cash tax liability.  In addition, our income taxes and other tax liability in the future could be adversely affected by numerous factors including changes in tax laws, regulations, accounting principles, or interpretations thereof, which could adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.

Item 6.

Exhibits.

See the Exhibit Index beginning on page 24 of this Form 10-Q.

---

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		ACTIVE POWER, INC.
		(Registrant)
October 31, 2014		/s/ Mark A. Ascolese
(Date)		Mark A. Ascolese
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)
October 31, 2014		/s/ James A. Powers
(Date)		James A. Powers
		Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

---

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.	Description of Exhibit
3.1*	Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Active Power, Inc., as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Active Power Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 1, 2014)
3.2*	Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of Active Power, Inc., as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Active Power Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 1, 2014)
4.1*	Specimen certificate for shares of Common Stock (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Active Power’s IPO Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-36946))
4.2*	See Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2 for provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of the registrant defining the rights of holders of common stock
31.1†	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2†	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15(d)-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1††	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2††	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101††	The following financial statements from the Active Power’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, formatted in XBRL: (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

---

*	Incorporated by reference to the indicated filing.

†	Filed with this report.

††	Furnished with this report.

 

 

24

---

---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Active Power, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending September 30, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark A. Ascolese, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

	/s/ Mark A. Ascolese
	Mark A. Ascolese
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	October 31, 2014

 

 

---